Blog: The absolute latest random thoughts
Kari Byron news
09.2002 10.2002 11.2002 12.2002 01.2003 02.2003 03.2003 04.2003 05.2003 06.2003 07.2003 08.2003 09.2003 10.2003 11.2003 12.2003 01.2004 02.2004 03.2004 04.2004 05.2004 06.2004 07.2004 08.2004 09.2004 10.2004 11.2004 12.2004 01.2005 02.2005 03.2005 04.2005 05.2005 06.2005 07.2005 08.2005 09.2005 10.2005 11.2005 12.2005 01.2006 02.2006 03.2006 04.2006 05.2006 06.2006 07.2006 08.2006 09.2006 10.2006 11.2006 12.2006 04.2007 05.2007 06.2007 07.2007 08.2007 12.2007 01.2008 02.2008 05.2008 06.2008 07.2008 08.2008 12.2008 01.2009 02.2009 03.2009 04.2009 05.2009 06.2009 07.2009 09.2009 10.2009 11.2009 12.2009 01.2010 02.2010 03.2010 04.2010 05.2010 06.2010 07.2010 08.2010 09.2010 10.2010 11.2010 12.2010 01.2011 02.2011 03.2011 04.2011 05.2011 06.2011 07.2011 09.2011 10.2011 11.2011 12.2011 01.2012 02.2012 04.2012 07.2012 10.2012 11.2012 01.2013 02.2013 03.2013
1.31.2006Electronic Toy, 1975-1979
If the starting bid on a 10-day auction weren't over $50 right now, I'd consider getting one... but Ruth wouldn't appreciate my bringing more junk into the house!
this article already or not... but there it is: an interview with Ginger Alexander (among others).
Now, reader, I have one question: What's the draw to Ginger Alexander? Seriously, I'm curious! You're here because either 1) you're a friend/relative of mind who's fascinated by my daily musings, or 2) a search for "Ginger Alexander" brought you here.
So, what makes Ginger interesting to you?
Go ahead and comment -- Blogger makes it easy.
My Ginger-related hits are starting to outnumber my Kari Byron hits, and I'm just wondering why.
www.lexmarked.com), it broke most of the existing search-engine links.
Despite helpful error pages and the like, my visits have dropped off to practically nothing.
I wonder how long it'll take before that coveted "Google juice" returns? And, in the meantime, how will people track down my rebate-related advice?
1.29.2006G e n e r a t i o n W h y ?
1.28.2006Legal or illegal: How do you tell?:"When Roxanna Barr applied for a meat-processing job at Swift & Co. in Worthington, Minn., last month, she walked into the interview room with a Social Security card and a green card that authorized her to work.The advantage I have in having obtained an HRD degree (which, fun or not, has an HRM component) is that I know that's true!
"Sitting at a table opposite the Swift interviewer, Barr was asked first was asked whether she was 18 years old and then, 'Are you legally authorized to work in the United States?'
"Barr said yes and showed the required two documents to prove it. And that's all Swift, or any employer, can ask for.
"To ask for more identification, say a driver's license, is grounds for charges of discrimination.
"'I don't think your average person understands what employers can and cannot ask,' said James Hamilton, Swift's human resource director in Worthington, 'or that large penalties and fines are administered if you ask for more.'"
But the bind that employers are in is usually lost in the debate, isn't it?
1.27.2006www.emlarson.com), so this will be a bit messy for a day or two.
(I've been working in a test template, which is fine, but at some point you need to bite the bullet and apply it to some actual content, you know?)
UPDATE: Ruth mentioned that I made the huge mistake of using the b-word (the one that starts with "b" and ends with the three-letter description of a felled tree), which is a horrible thing to do when it comes to AdSense. So, I fixed that right-quick! Yikes!
Wired News: Jobs vs. Gates: Who's the Star?.
The author's answer?On the evidence, [Jobs is] nothing more than a greedy capitalist who's amassed an obscene fortune. It's shameful. In almost every way, Gates is much more deserving of Jobs' rock star exaltation.
Sounds harsh... but some of us are old enough to remember the days, a couple decades ago, when Apple ran the show in the school system and served as the proverbial 800-pound gorilla in the room. Apple IIs on every desk (at a time with Commodore 64s would have served better for pennies on the dollar), right?
1.22.2006Gallery of Contestants and Champions.
Got a favorite that I should try out?
They do. The Internet answers all!
Read the Review: Time Machine rolling ball clock
You can find them at various places for $50 -- more than I want to spend. But fun to know they're still out there.
I remember them being for sale in the window of some store in the Rosedale Mall. And it's funny that the reviewer mentions that they've been on sale "since at least the late 1970s". Yup, that's exactly when Dad and I would go to Rosedale and I'd stare at this thing in the window.
I think the same store had the tilting wave machine with the clear and blue fluids sloshing back and forth.
Whatever the store was, it wasn't Spencer's Gifts, which is the place I always wanted to go into, and which Dad hated. But it had really cool lighting displays in back... including those fiber-optic lamps that look like fireworks burts. And these were the cool ones -- the really big ones, unlike the wimpy little knock-offs of today.
Maybe I should go hunt for one on eBay...
1.15.2006educating eric: What's up with Yahoo Publisher Content Guidelines?
Know what ads got stuck at the bottom of that one when I just popped it up?
"NaturalGreens Pharmaceutical grade supplements for detoxification and liver health."
Hmmm. That's a bad sign. What else?
"Are You Clean Inside? Death begins in the colon. Why is detoxification so crucial?"
And my personal favorite...
"the Colon Cleansing Kit(tm). Cleanse intestinal buildup. Photos document results of cleanse."
1.13.2006Minneapolis Public Library: Weatherball Photos and Lore
1.06.2006General Lead Capture, you'll see the "terms of service" for Yahoo! Publisher advertising -- the competitor to Google AdSense.
Seems normal enough... it starts out with things like:
Yahoo! Publisher Network does not wish to be associated with certain types of content, behavior and/or products, and will not accept sites that contain this type of content. This includes, but is not limited to:
Violence, excessive use of vulgar or obscene language
Excessive, duplicate or competing advertisements
Okay, I can live with that. But the next one threw me:
Content related to human suffering or death
Regular readers will know that I write about abortion here every so often, and write from a pro-life perspective, so I think that topic is very much about "human suffering" and "death". Does that count?
Further down the list, past "Gambling" and "Illegal drugs and drug paraphernalia", you get:
Propaganda, potentially offensive or controversial content
What blog isn't "potentially offensive or controversial"?
But the final blow is just past the mid-point of the list:
Political, religious or charitable organizations, issues or causes
What more can I say?
Why on earth would Yahoo "not wish to be associated with... charitable organizations, issues or causes"?!? Religion and politics, sure, go ahead and run away from those... but Yahoo! is telling me that they want nothing to do with a "puppies are cute; support your local humane society" site!
Does this make any sense?
1.02.2006New Year Predictions for 2004 - Part 2: "53. A huge hurricane will destroy New Orleans."
Wrong in 2004... but not-so-wrong for 2005! Wow!
Granted, predicting that New Orleans was going to flood is kinda a no-brainer... but, still!
emlarson.com: Home | Blog| Work | Tech | Life | Lord | Play | Mail
Entire site contents Copyright © 2000-2005 Eric M. Larson
All rights reserved, please don't steal my stuff, etc. etc. etc.