Blog: The absolute latest random thoughts

Kari Byron news

highlighted links:

Living in micromanaging

MNBlogCon 2017 musings

Voluntary and enthusiastic

Twitter Blocking explained

Social Marketing... at last!

The Psychology of Collective Action, Social Media,...

Fwd: [#MRO-489-36585]: com-give.com scam site

Today's "what's this company?" mystery: Safer Alco...

Losing classroom content

Cross pollinating outreach ideas

earlier posts:

09.2002   10.2002   11.2002   12.2002   01.2003   02.2003   03.2003   04.2003   05.2003   06.2003   07.2003   08.2003   09.2003   10.2003   11.2003   12.2003   01.2004   02.2004   03.2004   04.2004   05.2004   06.2004   07.2004   08.2004   09.2004   10.2004   11.2004   12.2004   01.2005   02.2005   03.2005   04.2005   05.2005   06.2005   07.2005   08.2005   09.2005   10.2005   11.2005   12.2005   01.2006   02.2006   03.2006   04.2006   05.2006   06.2006   07.2006   08.2006   09.2006   10.2006   11.2006   12.2006   04.2007   05.2007   06.2007   07.2007   08.2007   12.2007   01.2008   02.2008   05.2008   06.2008   07.2008   08.2008   12.2008   01.2009   02.2009   03.2009   04.2009   05.2009   06.2009   07.2009   09.2009   10.2009   11.2009   12.2009   01.2010   02.2010   03.2010   04.2010   05.2010   06.2010   07.2010   08.2010   09.2010   10.2010   11.2010   12.2010   01.2011   02.2011   03.2011   04.2011   05.2011   06.2011   07.2011   09.2011   10.2011   11.2011   12.2011   01.2012   02.2012   04.2012   07.2012   10.2012   11.2012   01.2013   02.2013   03.2013   05.2013   05.2014   06.2014   07.2014   12.2014   01.2015   02.2015   03.2015   06.2015   11.2015   02.2016   03.2016   04.2016   05.2016   06.2016   11.2016   04.2017   10.2017  


An Open Letter to Scoop.it

I'm hearing from more and more faculty about Scoop.it -- a "curation site" that they think might help them assemble resources for their students.

And I thought it was a great idea.

But there seems to be one fatal flaw.

Scoop.it (apparently) doesn't monitor its user sites for active content.  Yet it assigns topic-based "vanity URLs" that, once taken, are unavailable for others.

So if you have a topic that you want to "curate," you'd better hope that you can find a word related to it that hasn't already been taken by a topic-squatter who's saying nothing about it.

  • "/religion" is taken... and was last updated in early 2011.
  • "/philosophy" is taken... and has only one link to one external page -- either a mistake, disinterest, or SPAM.
  • "/fatherhood" was grabbed by a woman a couple weeks ago and she hasn't posted anything at all.
(You can tell by the fact I got down to "fatherhood" as a topic that I was pretty desperate for a coherent topic.  Unfortunately, it was available last month and had I known that Scoop.it didn't care whether people posted any content I would have grabbed it "just-in-case." Instead, I was trying to be a good Scoop.it citizen and waited until I had some content lined up before I logged back in to assign it to myself... only to find it unavailable...)

And, no, I really don't want to invest any time in writing under "/fatherhood-as-seen-by-eric".

If these topic pages were active, I'd have no problem with other people "owning" them.  And if Scoop.it assigned everything by username (or, at least, "nested" them under a username directory) I'd have no problem, either -- "/fluffybunny12/fatherhood" could maintain a site separate from "/emlarson/fatherhood".

But if you're going to present something as authoritative -- if you're going to assign a URL like "/philosophy" to a particular user -- then, if you want to encourage people to participate, you'd better make sure that there's something there.

How can this be solved?

Simple:  Act on the existing TOS:
Scoop.it reserves the right to revoke and/or reassign any username and/or topic name in its sole discretion. You understand and agree that Scoop.it reserves the right to change, remove, alter or delete any username and/or topic name, with or without prior notice to you, at any time and for any reason in Scoop.it's sole discretion.

Just set up a policy/practice that any topic not updated in x-many days (30? 90?) be revoked and "returned to circulation" -- either with the old content intact, or new-and-empty.  (Take your pick.)  Warn users of pending revocation with a friendly email.  Offer longer topic-ownership windows to users as a benefit of paid membership.

This isn't hard.  And it would make Scoop.it a much more interesting and viable resource on the internet.

Monetizing myself

I wonder if there's a model out there for folks to earn money from their intellectual property, other than slapping unread advertising onto a site? Maybe if I had a "niche market" then the usual Google ads would work, but for my world -- which is either a general look at my life, or topics that don't have a "sales" element to them -- I don't think that's a viable fit.

So am I doomed to be a "starving (Internet) artist" ...and, if so, would you like to buy a sofa-sized blog post for only $49?



July Thunderstorm Approachig

[wpvideo LPgwSJxb]



emlarson.com:   Home | Blog | Work | Tech | Life | Lord | Play | Mail

Entire site contents Copyright © 2000-2005 Eric M. Larson

All rights reserved, please don't steal my stuff, etc. etc. etc.