Shouldn't "sexy" be more exciting than this?

I just had the fabled "Sexy Guys and Sexy Girls" advertisement appear when I was working on my blog. I can't be sure it's the same ad that my Dad reported seeing (read through the blog comments and you'll encounter the conversation) but, with Ruth's permission, I took a look at the URL and typed it in. (Becuase, of course, I can't click on my own ads, according to Google's TOS.)

What apppeared? A page about Conference calling.

Wow.

Pardon me while I go take a cold shower.

The only thing I can think is that the person who bought the "sexy" ad is hoping that people click on it, then click on one of the ads that appears on his/her page, and in that way makes some money back. But to try to connect the dots and say that one of the things you might want to do with a "sexy" person of the opposite (or perhaps not) gender is... get a rip-roarin' conference call going... Well, I'm not buyin' it just yet.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Passing on Panel Discussions?

In his latest podcast ( Blogarithms IT Conversations News: August 14, 2005 ), Doug Kaye mentioned an interesting anecdotal tidbit: People seem less interested in panel discussions at conferences than they do in single speakers. The panel discussions get lower ratings at ITConversations.com, and... there was some other reason he mentioned it, too. (Okay, so I don't remember. Sorry!) As I was listening to one of their panel discussions this morning, I had a thought: It was really hard to follow. It takes a lot of mental energy to keep up with who's-saying-what. And I don't even particular care about the who's-who; it would be even worse if I really need to know which person was making a particular point. Could that be what people are reacting to when they rate panel discussions lower than single-speaker talks?
Read more

Commercial comments (Blogging from Word!)

Ironically, I’ve got two commercial-related things going on in my mind right now. On the Ericast, I’ve been discussing how commercials are going to get more and more imbedded into content; I think we’re going to drift away from “spot radio” or “spot television”, and even drift away from traditional “product placement”, and move toward a picture-in-picture or screen crawl or other “embedded advertising”.  That way, you’ll be unable to avoid the advertisement… and you’ll want to see it, because skipping it would mean that you’d miss out on the content.  (Imagine, for example, a HGTV demo on sponge-painting that takes up the top 2/3rds of the screen, with the bottom 1/3rd showing things like “BEHR Paint on sale at Home Depot!  20% off!”.) I might hate living in a world filled with television that looks like that… but it probably would be effective. But, speaking of, I’ve found a program that removes commercials from MPG files!  And it really works!  I’ll blog it next, from the site. Why n
Read more
USATODAY.com - Schoolyard bullies get nastier online / Ick. Ick, ick, ick. Glad to know that technology is making parenting oh-so-much simpler, right?
Read more