Years ago in TekWar, William Shatner (yes, that William Shatner) wrote about a world that had lifelike androids wandering around. That wasn't the plot -- it was about a drug called Tek, though that wasn't really the plot, either. But the androids were a memorable component. In his book, many were used for... "personal entertainment" purposes. Here's the first step: BBC NEWS | Science/Nature | Japanese develop 'female' android
In his latest podcast ( Blogarithms IT Conversations News: August 14, 2005 ), Doug Kaye mentioned an interesting anecdotal tidbit: People seem less interested in panel discussions at conferences than they do in single speakers. The panel discussions get lower ratings at ITConversations.com, and... there was some other reason he mentioned it, too. (Okay, so I don't remember. Sorry!) As I was listening to one of their panel discussions this morning, I had a thought: It was really hard to follow. It takes a lot of mental energy to keep up with who's-saying-what. And I don't even particular care about the who's-who; it would be even worse if I really need to know which person was making a particular point. Could that be what people are reacting to when they rate panel discussions lower than single-speaker talks?